This agree to disagree concept that has been pushed by the religious as a means of backing off a discussion that they cannot win has always bothered me. It arose yesterday when I was visited by three ghosts... no the JWs, as a response to evidence of the existence of god.
After a bit of thinking, I realized that it is an acceptance of conflicting beliefs that cannot be resolved to their satisfaction, and not wanting to resolve those truths to reality. There is no god; at least no physical god. God, beyond space and time leaves the concept realm, and no where else, that the religious will not go near. They just go away, and not challenge their own understanding, for they could not withstand the suggestion that their beliefs are wrong.
Feelings are caused by beliefs, and are underlain by beliefs that suggest something. The religious always believe they are correct; it can be no other way to drive themselves to do what they do. But when one takes the time to lay it all out, at best, god is just a concept, and the religious teachers have been creating a dream/ concept world for you to believe in. Oh well, they are just wrong, there is no other way to say it. The religious cannot deal with those who know, and challenge their beliefs, so they go to this agree to disagree and sulk off.