Friday, March 24, 2017

M 103 is not the solution

It seams like colors and religious want special treatment. I do not think they are entitled to anything more that we whites.   

So what is the dividing line between the normal abuse that the public servants (including police) dish out to all and racist / sexist remarks. We whites take a lot of abuse from many we encounter on a daily basis. Just look at the abuse we old fogies get down at the local coffee shop. Some of what is taken as racist is just federal civil service abuse and normal interpersonal abuse.

The real solution for religious percussion is to abandon all religions. These are just scam at the conceptual level anyway, and have a negative value anyway. The solution for race issues is to recognize that we are a group of different species flocking together, and that we treat our own species different that we treat other species. Get over in and grow skin, and recognize they as different species. All whites are not even the same species, there are the gay species, the one percent species, the hillbilly species, the middle class species, the street people species, the malignant overlords species... etc. The inter species relationship is far different than the within species relationship between individuals, as is the relationship between known and unknown within one species. Many within any species are just assholes, for the lack of a better work. We need to be able to deal with all kinds.

There is no physical evidence for any god. It is all just concepts, ideas, beliefs, superstition. The books are just documents of the superstitions. There may be some history, perhaps, perhaps not. These books may contains much alternative facts, story, as well as stories of what to do or not to do, but no statement of which. The logical thing is to eliminate all religion, and learn to live in reality without thinking there is a magical old man in the sky.

We often see bullying by a religion, trying to force a specific cultural belief onto the remainder of the population. Consider the "no drawings of Moe rule of Islam." Bullying, is forcing others to behave as the bully desires, against the public opinion of what behavior should be, aka standard practice. Without religion, we would know that we all are responsible for our own actions, in the here and now. We could make more behaviors worth spending money on to prosecute, like fraud and even treason. Islams, on seeing a depiction of Moe feel offended. They want us to apologize and adhere to their beliefs. No, that is bullying, and is the start of the slippery slope. There is no gods, so your feelings are your problems. Get over it.

Acceptance of violence is a cultural and time dependent thing. In old time, much more violence was acceptable then now. All violence should be eliminated. Any violence should be prosecuted by the state, to the point of seizing all assets of the propagator, deporting them, if they are not nationals. If they are national, long prison sentences, possible even forced labor, or slavery.

Parental approved mutilations should be a civil matter, with no statute of limitations, so that the child can suit the parents at the age of majority for every thing they have, leaving the parents in poverty if they dare to mutilate.

We should not tolerate any consideration of sharia by Islams, for it is treason to consider to replace Canadian Law with something else. Note that sharia means law, so to say sharia law is redundancy. Anyone suggesting sharia is guilty of counseling treason. 

I think the Heritage Department should define acceptable conduct for everyone, an impossible task. But with no physical evidence for god, first the would need to say that there is no god, therefore all religions are just people living in a fantasy, or they would be defining a fantasy world.

In the next 240 days, behind closed doors the malignant overloads will make decisions that do not reflect the desires of the populous. It is necessary to voice our opinions.

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Out with Political Correctness

Out with Political Correctness, up with truth.

We have been hearing about native reconciliation. Yet the natives shoot moose from the road in acreage subdivision and are not charged because they are natives.

The Natives are just running wild, and some of the females get harvested by the predators. They do not behave like whites, consider the predators, and not run wild. And of course we whites are at fault. Oh well.  

Saturday, February 25, 2017

On Native Reconciliation

 On Native reconciliation has a long way to go. Along the way the natives will need to take responsibility for there actions as well as their part in this world and their behaviors. Things like this do not fly well, and you can bet that this family has lost any willing for reconciliation. Native rights must matched with native responsibility.

If the natives are not going to behave in a responsible manner, we the people will not put up with the shit. The government can want peace and respect for the natives, but the government cannot dictate what, we the people actually think nor why.   

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Organic computer short coming

Organic computer short coming of only negative conformation signaling is rather interesting and will generate random errors until the error is recognized as an error and cancelled. This produces random generation of odd signals, and is the foundation of imagination and creativity.

What am I on about? well any signal sent our can be positive, negative, or null/neutral/just missing. So a selfish neuron fires a signal down to a  hedonistic synapse, to another neuron's synapse, and hence to the next neuron. Now if and only if that neuron objects is a signal sent back. If the original signal is right, or partial, or not received, no confirmation signal is sent back. This would not do in computing for the error rate is to high, and much is not received nor understood. In a leaky first generation organic computer, this is as good as it gets, until a better method is adopted. Retained is a separate matter.

The advantage of this sort of communication is that it generates errors between neurons. But that is not an advantage!! It is if we value unclear thinking, imagination, parasite concepts that control behavior to the group standard (right or wrong standard not in question here). Well it worked well enough to get to this point, but now that we know this "error possibility" perhaps we need to implement a correction / check phase as to the correctness of all hypothesis we utilize?  Perhaps the next step is a parallel system, using the human to input, output, generate alternatives, and the computer to process and store data.

The necktop has errors, and we have taken up errors in our education. It is just that hypothesis that we have learned but some of the assumption hypothesis are also likely wrong. This is dangerous as without certainty, and hence confidence in our knowledge, we can become frozen in the decision process. Neither is correct, but all we can move all suspect hypotheses to a group of  X believes Y, but there is no logical proof. This is a logical thing to do, but others do no like "I will take that under advisement."

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Looking forward - Canada vs. USA

In looking forward, there are some obvious differences between Canada and the USA.

First, in the matter of health care, Canada has a total health care system which will keep all people alive. Cost is not an issue for the individual. So the the parents can be kept alive by their children until the machines are unplugged. Or if the senior wishes, they may end their own suffering. There is a danger however, of going beyond and losing control of making the choice. DNR medallion may be required to prevent extended suffering. Parents can, at little or no cost to themselves, have human pets, if they do not bear healthy children. This will bankrupt the government if something is not done soon (5-10 years). The natives are the second big drain on the government, from which the drain typically just grows as they reproduce.

The US, on the other hand, for those who cannot afford health insurance, have the right to die. End of. But the government is trying to say no abortions, no public birth control, by pushing their opinions of morality onto others. The richer can have health care as long as they can pay the premiums and fees.

Education is heading the same way, the wealthy will be educated on both sides of the border, but the Canadian education, at the public level, will be slightly better. The US will still have milder winter weather, but too hot and wild in the summer. Canada will be milder than it was but we will need good heat also.

Two in thirty five of Canadians go south for some of the winter, taking their CPAP machines and/or oxygen enricheners with them. These were among the top few percent of wage earners. When the health insurance becomes too much, they will stop going, but a new crop of snowbird will arrive.

The US has a Christian problem; the do as I say christian attitude, is causing problem between the atheist, agnostic, satanists, Islam and free radical groups. They are shutting down science with the likes of Ken Ham and his ilk, climate change deniers, and the like. It is not climate change that will get the human species, but the atmosphere contamination with CO2 and methane combined with population growth, and animals, energy desires and needs of modern societies.  Everyone is demanding more, and there are more people growing now. Population stabilization should be prompted, as well as reduction in the public support of nonviable unproductive humans.

The US is pushing oil, energy, and the likes, not doing anything to limit carbon dioxide. Alberta has capped several big producers and starting to encourage conservation, but nothing toward carbon sequestering. Active carbon sequestering, and carbon sequestering with a positive cash flow should be encouraged.

Canada has a first past the post electoral system and appointed Senate (upper house) with partisan biases. It has some issues, but the Judiciary is near independent. The US has a convoluted system that has not kept up with population changes and has an appointed executive arm where the implementation of law can be modified at will. Neither system is correct, but the Canadian system has disadvantages only for minor parties. The money should be remover from both systems. Both favor long term political types and the rich that can buy votes.